Web Analytics Blogs

Eric T. Peterson has been working in web analytics for over ten years and has built up an incredibly rich body of knowledge about the subject, knowledge Mr. Peterson works to share every week here in his Web Analytics Demystified weblog. Whether you're new to the subject or the most experienced practitioner, you should join the thousands of people around the globe already subscribing to Peterson's blog and start reading today.

Subscribe to Eric T. Peterson's weblog

Archive for 'Random Thoughts'

« Previous Entries

Europe and the Web Analytics Association

Regular readers know that I travel to Europe twice a year to do business and work with my partners Satama and LBi/OX2. During my most recent trip I was delighted to have more time to talk at length with a wide variety of companies, practitioners, and thought leaders and a few things stood out in my mind after these conversations:

  1. The European market is not unlike the U.S. market in terms of practitioner experience and overall thought leadership. I reported this after my last trip based primarily on survey data, but have been delighted to verify that there are some really amazing people doing some truly great things “across the pond.” This includes end-users and analytics managers inside companies and thought and practice leaders like Steve Jackson at Satama, Aurelie Pols and her team at LBi/OX2, Dennis Mortensen, Lars Johannsen, Oliver Schiffers, Marianina Chapin, Brian Clifton, and a whole lot of folks I’m forgetting to list! In a way, Dennis Mortensen recently became the “Avinash Kaushik” of Europe, a full-blown analytics evangelist!
  2. The European market is different than the U.S. market in terms of investment in web analytics, although less so that I previously believed. After countless conversations about technology, people, and process, I kept coming back to the same conclusion: Europe is somewhere between two and four years behind the U.S. in terms of investment in web analytics. More specifically, I believe that the northern countries (Nordics, UK, Holland, primarily) are more like the U.S. in terms of their investment and, broadly speaking, the lag-behind time increases as you move further south. My evidence is anecdotal to be sure, but when I tested the theory most people working for pan-European organizations agreed — do you?

Based on these two points I come to the inevitable conclusion that Europe is about to really take off in terms of the adoption and use of web analytics. Those of you keeping track will recall that it was about two years ago that the practice of web analytics really started to accelerate here in the U.S. I think that the northern European countries especially are about to begin this same type of rapid adoption/expansion we’ve seen over the past two years, which is excellent news!

Now, some of you are certainly saying “well duh, Peterson” either because you work for a U.S.-based vendor who has been bulking up in Europe for the last 12 months, or more likely because you’re European and are experiencing what I’ve described first hand. Fair enough. But my point is not that Europe is running behind the U.S. in adoption of analytics; my point is that European practitioners, consultants, and vendors are in a different place than their U.S.-based counterparts and thusly would benefit from a different support organization than we benefit from here in North America.  Specifically, I believe that Europe should have its own Web Analytics Association.

Yep, I think we need a EuWAA.

Because the needs of European practitioners, vendors, consultants, and even the European media are different, I increasingly suspect that a North American-based WAA may not be best suited to provide the same type of great opportunities, educational events, and benefits we appreciate in the U.S. and Canada. And, while I agreed to not name names, I think some European WAA members don’t disagree with this assessment and would relish the chance to provide/receive additional value from a more locally run association.

A sister organization in Europe, one governed by a European Board of Directors and funded primarily by European vendors and consulting firms, would invariably be better able to serve the needs of specific markets at different stages of analytics maturity. The EuWAA could set country-specific pricing, have both regional and pan-European events, and make decisions that were carefully focused on the needs of different European constituencies.

I’m not saying anything is wrong with the current WAA; I think that the current and past board’s of directors have done a good job working to include European members in the decision making process and overall value chain.  I’m saying is that there is an opportunity to “think different” (to quote Jim Sterne) and consider how a more regional focus might be better for everyone. The NaWAA could focus on North American events, opportunites, outreach, and issues and create even more value for members here in the states and Canada.  And the NaWAA and EuWAA could work together to provide value for emerging markets across the globe.

In terms of funding, I would propose that A) there are a ton of European vendors who would be willing to support the EuWAA, B) that the U.S.-based vendors looking to expand into Europe would be motivated to support the group, C) European companies and practitioners would be more likely to support a European organization focused on the specific needs of European businesses and D) it would be very appropriate for the NaWAA to provide seed capital to this new, sister organization.

Web Analytics Demystified would gladly join as a founding member since we’re a global organization!

I don’t want to get into more specifics here, but if you have an open mind you might see that the idea makes a ton of sense and that a lot of the necessary work has already been done. And while I’m not 100% sure which of the European citizens running for the WAA Board have been elected, between those fine folks, the European thought leaders, and forward thinking European vendors and consultancies, I firmly believe that EuWAA can be done successfully.

I also believe, while some will argue this, that the Web Analytics Association in general will be better for breaking up into regionally focused sister organizations. Because our practice is still relatively young, there is undoubtedly differential geographic maturation and I think this needs to be recognized and treated appropriately.

Anyway, I just wanted to put the idea out there. With the annual meeting/party happening in a few weeks in San Francisco it seemed like as good a time as any to bring EuWAA up and get people talking.

Now I too am a lazy blogger …


Because I have finally, after much goading, joined the Twitter generation. It took Aaron Gray from WebTrends and like 11 beers (which I felt this morning, mind you) after a very successful Web Analytics Wednesday event here in Portland to get me to join Twitter. Hell, I didn’t even join after meeting Biz Stone and boating around Rotterdam with him last summer (sorry Biz!) But Aaron made me wonder who Twitter streams might be used in the engagement calculation so like a cat to milk I went running.

Incidentally I did not say “Twitter has no value” or at least I don’t think I said that.  I suspect there was some qualification involved (although see my above comment about 11 beers … sheesh!)

Thanks Aaron. Yet another excuse to play with my iPhone, not my kids. You rule.

Want to follow me? I’m easy to find!

Great news from Brussels and our friends at OX2!

This past week I have been having a glorious time traipsing about Europe talking to some very, very nice people about web analytics. My week started in London at the largest Web Analytics Wednesday in history and progressed to Amsterdam, then Brussels, and now to Helsinki, Finland. As I begin to wind things down, finishing up in Finland tomorrow and heading back to London just prior to going home, I wanted to share some really great news!

It gives me great pleasure to meta-introduce you to the first baby to be born of a true “web analytics couple”: Lucca Dechamps Pols, due in late April to the very wonderful and talented Aurelie Pols and Rene Dechamps Otamendi from Belgium’s LBi/OX2!

Those of you who know Rene and Aurelie surely know how excited, proud, and a little bit stressed out both parents are right now. Since I love being a dad I spent part of my time in Belgium regaling the couple with stories about how much fun it is to be a parent. I’m sure they’d love to hear your encouragement as well, either via comments or directly!

This tremendous event comes hot on the heels of Rene and Aurelie selling OX2 to the well respected interactive agency, LBi. I was honored to meet the CEO and CFO of LBi and happy to hear that they’re both quite excited about the capabilities that Rene, Aurelie, and the entire team at OX2 bring to LBi. It will be quite a year for R/A learning the joys of parenthood amidst their earn-out period but I have great faith in both mom and dad!

Congratulations to you both and I’m excited to meet Lucca when I return to Europe in the Fall.

Web analytics is hard!

The blogger Avinash Kaushik recently won an award for his post that largely echoed the content of my first book, Web Analytics Demystified. While I have never heard of the award, I am happy for Mr. Kaushik and excited because his repeated mention of my book’s title is driving incremental sales. Thanks Avinash!While I’m happy for Avinash, I have to wonder about his repeated insistence that “web analytics is easy.” I wrote as much in a comment I posted to his blog. The comment has not yet appeared (not sure why, maybe Avinash is on vacation) but I’m interested in your reaction to my position so I figured “hey, I have a blog …” and have published the comment below.

Basically I think that web analytics is hard — not easy or necessarily complex — but I think that this is very good news! “Hard” is something that all of us can overcome with determination and effort, just like the New York Giants did this past Sunday … all we have to do is recognize the level of effort and determination that is required and set expectations accordingly.

The verbatim content of the (missing) comment follows:

Avinash,

Congratulations on your award. I’ve never heard of the award but I don’t work nearly has hard on SEM/SEO as you do. Regardless I’m sure winning this award is quite an important accomplishment for you.

I also wanted to thank you. As the author of “Web Analytics Demystified” — the classic work you say your post pays homage to — it was interesting to hear your take on the subject. More interesting was how your post positively impacted sales of the book — direct sales were up nearly 40% from the month previous!

Perhaps your post reminded people that some of us have been around “demystifying” web analytics for a long time.

Either way, despite some people’s complaints that you were inconsiderate in your attempt to game my brand and copyright, I can assure you that I do appreciate your willingness to continue to bring awareness to my work, both as an author and as a consultant. And I sincerely hope you didn’t mind my tongue-in-cheek title for my AMA presentation …

Still, I wanted to ask you one question: Do you think the Giant’s thought that winning the Super Bowl was complex? Or do you think they thought it was hard?

I ask because you seem hung-up on my assertion that “web analytics is hard”, going out of your way to try and convince people that it is “easy but complex, not hard” and that somehow complex is preferred.

And while I’m not sure why you’re so violently opposed to my assertion, I do disagree with you — web analytics is hard, and that is fantastically good news! Web analytics is hard just like an underdog with a young quarterback winning the Super Bowl is hard. Nothing good is easy, but anyone, anywhere can do something difficult simply by being dedicated to the end product.

  • Sacking Tom Brady is hard (hell, very hard) but the Giants defense did it again and again and again
  • Converting on third down is hard, but Eli Manning and his receivers did it when it counted the most

There is nothing particularly complex about football, perhaps save contract negotiations, and there is nothing overly-complex about web analytics. In my experience the complexity that does come up in web analytics usually comes from “over-promise, under-deliver” and end-user needs for basic tools like segmentation and data integration that are lacking in some of the most popular applications, not from the practice of web analytics itself.

  • Web analytics is hard, but anyone with enough motivation can overcome this obstacle and, in your own words, create amazing, magnificent, and wonderful success!
  • Web analytics is hard, but simply by recognizing this and moving beyond the “web analytics is easy” hyperbole companies are able to create the right expectation about the effort required to be successful.
  • Web analytics is hard, and that is excellent, excellent news. Because if web analytics were impossible there would be no need for Google Analytics or any of the other great applications available today, but if web analytics was easy, most of us would be massively under-performing.
  • Web analytics is hard, but just like the Giants and every other Cinderella team in the history of sports, hard can be overcome through sheer determination, effort, and a well-formed plan for success: often the result is greatness.

I hope you’ll print this comment, and I know my thoughts will do nothing to dissuade you from your “web analytics is easy” mantra, but I had some time (ironically waiting to fly to New York where I hope to catch a Giant ticker-tape parade this week) and wanted to comment.

Again, congrats on the prestigious award! I’m sure that Stephan Spencer and Tamar Weinberg were quite bummed to have been nominated against you — I know I would be!

Sincerely,

Some have accused me of “over-messaging” on this point and pointing out the obvious. Perhaps, but as long as I keep seeing the relieved look on my client’s and audience’s faces when I tell this simple truth, and as long as people continue to come up to me and thank me for clarifying expectations about their use of measurement technology, I’m going to stay on message. “Web analytics is hard” seems to match well with people’s experience, and more importantly, nobody appears too perturbed about this statement (except for perhaps Mr. Kaushik and his business partners.)

What do you think? Is web analytics easy? Is it complex? Is it hard? Does it matter? Are you perturbed by my assertion? If so, why? What am I missing?! I’d love to receive your feedback …

Updates to Web Analytics Demystified.com

If you’ve been doing more than just reading my blog, you probably noticed that I massively updated the Web Analytics Demystified web site over the past week. Thanks to Jeff, Judah, and dozens of other kind folk who gently pushed me to build a site that was more reflective of the work I’m doing now.

Aside from an overhaul for the look-and-feel of the site, here are some of the things you may want to check out:

There is a lot more but it’s probably better if you just come back to the site and have a look rather than my trying to describe it all.

If you find any bugs please don’t hesitate to shoot me an email and let me know. I very much welcome your feedback on the new site and am open to suggestions. I have a handful of initiatives that I’m still working on, including some stuff around Web Analytics Wednesday, but welcome your ideas.

« Previous Entries